Extra Gems
- RTP
- 95.00%
- Volatility
- HIGH
- Max win
- 5,005×
- Hit freq
- -
- Grid
- -
- Bet
- -
- Released
- 2022-09-30
A playable demo is not available in your region.
Our take
Aztec-gems themed high-volatility slot from Platipus with 6×7 grid, 5005× max win, and 95.00% RTP.
Platipus is known for playful, vibrant slot design, and Extra Gems exemplifies that approach: the game is colourful, visually engaging, and mechanically sound in broad strokes. The 6×7 grid is exceptionally tall, creating a unique layout within the standard 5×3 or 6×4 market. Aztec and Mayan themes layer treasure iconography with gem symbols for visual richness.
The 95.00% RTP is fair for high-volatility play, and the 5005× max win is substantial. High volatility in a 6×7 structure suggests that payouts concentrate in feature modes or rare high-symbol alignments—the extra rows amplify combo potential.
Playtime is generally pleasant, though some rough edges exist: the Platipus design philosophy prioritises playfulness over polish, and Extra Gems reflects that. Visually, the game shines. Mechanically, it delivers solid entertainment value. The quirks are minor—nothing game-breaking, but enough to prevent Extra Gems from reaching top-tier status.
Pros
- 6×7 grid is unique and creates distinctive gameplay
- 95.00% RTP is fair for high-volatility slots
- 5005× max win is substantial and chase-worthy
- Vibrant Aztec-gem aesthetic is colourful and engaging
Cons
- Rough design edges prevent top-tier polish
- High volatility means extended dry spells expected
- Aztec-treasure-gem combination can feel visually cluttered
Math & maxes
Math breakdown
- Volatility score
- 3 / 5
- Max win
- 5,005x the stake
FAQ
Why is the grid 6×7 instead of the usual size?
The tall 6×7 layout is Platipus's choice for Extra Gems, creating more rows and more combo potential than traditional slots.
How volatile is this game?
High volatility. Expect long periods between wins, offset by occasional large payouts when features or rare alignments land.
What are the rough edges mentioned?
Source feedback notes minor visual and mechanical polish issues, though nothing that impairs core gameplay or fairness.
