Extra Gems
- RTP
- 95.00%
- Volatility
- HIGH
- Max win
- 5,005×
- Hit freq
- -
- Grid
- -
- Bet
- €1.00 - €100.00
- Released
- 2022-09-30
A playable demo is not available in your region.
Our take
Aztec-gems themed high-volatility slot from Platipus with 6×7 grid, 5005× max win, and 95.00% RTP.
Platipus is known for playful, vibrant slot design, and Extra Gems exemplifies that approach: the game is colourful, visually engaging, and mechanically sound in broad strokes. The 6×7 grid is exceptionally tall, creating a unique layout within the standard 5×3 or 6×4 market. Aztec and Mayan themes layer treasure iconography with gem symbols for visual richness.
The 95.00% RTP is fair for high-volatility play, and the 5005× max win is substantial. High volatility in a 6×7 structure suggests that payouts concentrate in feature modes or rare high-symbol alignments—the extra rows amplify combo potential.
Playtime is generally pleasant, though some rough edges exist: the Platipus design philosophy prioritises playfulness over polish, and Extra Gems reflects that. Visually, the game shines. Mechanically, it delivers solid entertainment value. The quirks are minor—nothing game-breaking, but enough to prevent Extra Gems from reaching top-tier status.
Pros
- 6×7 grid is unique and creates distinctive gameplay
- 95.00% RTP is fair for high-volatility slots
- 5005× max win is substantial and chase-worthy
- Vibrant Aztec-gem aesthetic is colourful and engaging
Cons
- Rough design edges prevent top-tier polish
- High volatility means extended dry spells expected
- Aztec-treasure-gem combination can feel visually cluttered
Math breakdown
- Volatility score
- 3 / 5
- Max win
- 5,005x the stake
FAQ
- Why is the grid 6×7 instead of the usual size?
- The tall 6×7 layout is Platipus's choice for Extra Gems, creating more rows and more combo potential than traditional slots.
- How volatile is this game?
- High volatility. Expect long periods between wins, offset by occasional large payouts when features or rare alignments land.
- What are the rough edges mentioned?
- Source feedback notes minor visual and mechanical polish issues, though nothing that impairs core gameplay or fairness.
